arbitrationrecusalcommercial disputehousing development
legislation
Statutes Cited
E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n
C
o
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
o
n
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
1
9
5
0
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
A
c
t
1
9
9
8
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
A
c
t
1
9
7
1
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
i
t
y
,
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
A
s
y
l
u
m
A
c
t
2
0
0
2
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
e
a
l
s
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
A
c
t
1
9
9
7
T
e
r
r
o
r
i
s
m
A
c
t
2
0
0
0
A
n
t
i
-
t
e
r
r
o
r
i
s
m
,
C
r
i
m
e
a
n
d
S
e
c
u
r
i
t
y
A
c
t
2
0
0
1
P
r
e
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
o
f
T
e
r
r
o
r
i
s
m
A
c
t
2
0
0
5
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
A
s
y
l
u
m
A
c
t
1
9
9
9
A
s
y
l
u
m
a
n
d
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
A
c
t
1
9
9
6
A
s
y
l
u
m
a
n
d
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
o
f
C
l
a
i
m
a
n
t
s
,
e
t
c
)
A
c
t
2
0
0
4
B
r
i
t
i
s
h
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
i
t
y
A
c
t
1
9
8
1
S
t
a
t
e
I
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
A
c
t
1
9
7
8
C
r
o
w
n
P
r
o
c
e
e
d
i
n
g
s
A
c
t
1
9
4
7
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
A
c
t
1
9
8
8
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
a
n
d
P
u
b
l
i
c
O
r
d
e
r
A
c
t
1
9
9
4
C
r
i
m
e
a
n
d
D
i
s
o
r
d
e
r
A
c
t
1
9
9
8
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
A
c
t
2
0
0
3
E
x
t
r
a
d
i
t
i
o
n
A
c
t
1
9
8
9
E
x
t
r
a
d
i
t
i
o
n
A
c
t
2
0
0
3
P
o
l
i
c
e
a
n
d
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
E
v
i
d
e
n
c
e
A
c
t
1
9
8
4
P
u
b
l
i
c
O
r
d
e
r
A
c
t
1
9
8
6
T
e
r
r
o
r
i
s
m
A
c
t
2
0
0
6
C
i
v
i
l
C
o
n
t
i
n
g
e
n
c
i
e
s
A
c
t
2
0
0
4
C
o
n
s
t
i
t
u
t
i
o
n
a
l
R
e
f
o
r
m
A
c
t
2
0
0
5
C
o
u
r
t
s
A
c
t
2
0
0
3
A
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
A
c
t
1
9
9
9
L
e
g
a
l
A
i
d
,
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
a
n
d
P
u
n
i
s
h
m
e
n
t
o
f
O
f
f
e
n
d
e
r
s
A
c
t
2
0
1
2
L
e
g
a
l
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
A
c
t
2
0
0
7
D
a
t
a
P
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
A
c
t
1
9
9
8
F
r
e
e
d
o
m
o
f
I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
A
c
t
2
0
0
0
R
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
I
n
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
o
r
y
P
o
w
e
r
s
A
c
t
2
0
0
0
S
e
r
i
o
u
s
O
r
g
a
n
i
s
e
d
C
r
i
m
e
a
n
d
P
o
l
i
c
e
A
c
t
2
0
0
5
I
d
e
n
t
i
t
y
C
a
r
d
s
A
c
t
2
0
0
6
B
o
r
d
e
r
s
,
C
i
t
i
z
e
n
s
h
i
p
a
n
d
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
A
c
t
2
0
0
9
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
A
c
t
2
0
1
4
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
A
c
t
2
0
1
6
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
i
t
y
a
n
d
B
o
r
d
e
r
s
A
c
t
2
0
2
2
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether Uchena JA should recuse himself due to potential bias from having previously heard related proceedings","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Uchena JA was part of bench in SC 338/20 that allowed appeal on procedural grounds"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant statutory body and first respondent company entered into a housing development agreement for 8000 units. A dispute arose leading to arbitration where the arbitrator awarded US$30 million to the first respondent. The appellant sought to set aside the award while the first respondent sought its recognition. After procedural irregularities were found in previous proceedings, the matter was remitted and the High Court again dismissed the setting aside application and recognized the award. The appellant appealed and the first respondent sought recusal of Uchena JA who had previously heard related procedural matters.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases