Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Supreme Court

National Railways of Zimbabwe v Joseph Marshall Stuart

[2021] ZWSC 70

Case Details

Court
Supreme Court
Date
4 June 2021
Citation
[2021] ZWSC 70
Judgment No.
SC 70/21
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Appeal

Bench

Presiding
Gwaunza DCJ
Author
Chitakunye AJA
Full Bench
Gwaunza DCJUchena JAChitakunye AJA
Areas of Law
Delictual liabilityDamages assessmentCurrency conversion in litigation
Keywords
damagesquantumcurrency amendmentmedical expensesloss of amenitiescontumeliahyperinflationRTGS dollars
Tags
damagescurrency conversionhyperinflationmedical expensesdefamationhumiliationcontumelia
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • J
  • u
  • s
  • t
  • i
  • c
  • e
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 1
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • e
  • (
  • S
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • n
  • c
  • e
  • s
  • )
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 7
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 8
  • E
  • u
  • r
  • o
  • p
  • e
  • a
  • n
  • C
  • o
  • n
  • v
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • o
  • n
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • ,
  • a
  • r
  • t
  • 5
  • E
  • u
  • r
  • o
  • p
  • e
  • a
  • n
  • C
  • o
  • n
  • v
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • o
  • n
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • ,
  • a
  • r
  • t
  • 6
  • E
  • u
  • r
  • o
  • p
  • e
  • a
  • n
  • C
  • o
  • n
  • v
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • o
  • n
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • ,
  • a
  • r
  • t
  • 3
  • P
  • r
  • i
  • s
  • o
  • n
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 5
  • 2
  • P
  • r
  • i
  • s
  • o
  • n
  • R
  • u
  • l
  • e
  • s
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 9
  • (
  • S
  • I
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 9
  • /
  • 7
  • 2
  • 8
  • )
  • P
  • a
  • r
  • o
  • l
  • e
  • B
  • o
  • a
  • r
  • d
  • R
  • u
  • l
  • e
  • s
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 7
  • (
  • S
  • I
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 7
  • /
  • 5
  • 7
  • 9
  • )
  • P
  • a
  • r
  • o
  • l
  • e
  • B
  • o
  • a
  • r
  • d
  • R
  • u
  • l
  • e
  • s
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 2
  • (
  • S
  • I
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 2
  • /
  • 2
  • 7
  • 5
  • )
  • M
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • a
  • l
  • H
  • e
  • a
  • l
  • t
  • h
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 8
  • 3
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • J
  • u
  • s
  • t
  • i
  • c
  • e
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 6
  • 7
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • J
  • u
  • s
  • t
  • i
  • c
  • e
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 8
  • 2
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • J
  • u
  • s
  • t
  • i
  • c
  • e
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 8
  • 8
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • J
  • u
  • s
  • t
  • i
  • c
  • e
  • a
  • n
  • d
  • P
  • u
  • b
  • l
  • i
  • c
  • O
  • r
  • d
  • e
  • r
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 4
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • A
  • p
  • p
  • e
  • a
  • l
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 6
  • 8
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • A
  • p
  • p
  • e
  • a
  • l
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 5
  • S
  • u
  • p
  • r
  • e
  • m
  • e
  • C
  • o
  • u
  • r
  • t
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 8
  • 1
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the court a quo erred in allowing amendment from ZWD to USD without rational basis","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Claims amended in 2014 from ZWD to USD due to hyperinflation"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether respondent proved damages for past medical expenses, loss of amenities, and contumelia/humiliation/defamation","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"No evidence led on amended USD quantum; respondent conceded original claims wiped out"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether judgment could be granted in USD payable in RTGS at interbank rate","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"SI 33/19 and SI 142/19 converted USD claims to RTGS at 1:1"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The respondent, a railway conductor, was dismissed for alleged fraud in 2000, reinstated by court order in 2002, and retired on medical grounds in 2003. He claimed damages for psychological injury allegedly caused by the appellant's conduct. The High Court awarded damages in USD converted from original ZWD claims. The Supreme Court confirmed liability but set aside the quantum awards for lack of evidence on amended USD claims.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →