National Constitutional Assembly (NCA) and Professor Lovemore Madhuku v The President of the Republic of Zimbabwe N.O. and The Chairperson/Acting Chairperson of the Zimbabwe Election Commission N.O.
{"issue_text":"Whether the President's conduct in fixing the referendum date is justiciable given section 31K(1) of the Constitution","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"President issued proclamation under section 3 of Referendums Act; applicants challenged the date as inadequate"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicants challenged the President's proclamation setting 16 March 2013 as the referendum date for the draft constitution, arguing the 30-day period was grossly inadequate and violated their rights to informed participation. The President opposed on preliminary grounds that his action was protected by constitutional immunity provisions.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases