{"issue_text":"Whether the council properly rescinded its resolution of 18 July 2011 under section 89 of the Urban Councils Act","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Council meeting of 12 August 2011, notice requirements"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the applicant had a prima facie right or legitimate expectation to the tender award","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"No official communication to applicant, public tender process"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the minister properly exercised power under section 314 to rescind council resolution","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Minister's letter of 16 August 2011"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant sought an interim interdict to prevent the award of a water supply tender to the second respondent, claiming it had been awarded the tender by council resolution on 18 July 2011. The council had purported to rescind this resolution on 12 August 2011, and the minister had also purported to rescind it on 16 August 2011.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases