{"issue_text":"Whether appellant's grounds of appeal raise points of law under section 98(10) of Labour Act","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Appellant raised procedural irregularities and interpretation of Code of Conduct"}
{"issue_text":"Whether disciplinary hearing was tainted with procedural irregularities","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Composition of Board of Inquiry, appellant walked out of hearing"}
{"issue_text":"Whether charges amounted to splitting of charges","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Appellant faced six counts, found guilty of three"}
{"issue_text":"Whether appellant's conduct amounted to participation in unlawful job action","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Appellant absent from work, involved in strike activities"}
{"issue_text":"Whether penalty of dismissal was appropriate given Code of Conduct provisions","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Code provides for Written Warning for first breach"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Appellant employee was dismissed for allegedly participating in unlawful job action after disciplinary hearing. Arbitrator upheld dismissal. Appellant appealed on grounds including procedural irregularities and misdirection on facts and law.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases