{"issue_text":"Whether the Designated Agent erred in finding that respondents were engaged on open-ended contracts","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"No initial written contracts produced; Section 12(3) Labour Act applies"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the Designated Agent erred in awarding claims for unpaid salaries","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Section 125 Labour Act places onus on employer to keep records"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant council employed the respondents on 31 January 2022 after their contracts with Romania International expired. The respondents claimed they were engaged on open-ended contracts while the appellant contended they were on fixed-term contracts. The appellant terminated the respondents' employment on 24 September 2022. The Designated Agent found the termination unlawful and ordered reinstatement or damages in lieu, plus salary arrears.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases