{"issue_text":"Whether the appellants were properly appointed as Trustees in terms of the Trust Deed","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"No special resolution produced, letters of appointment issued"}
{"issue_text":"Whether there were material disputes of fact requiring viva voce evidence","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Dispute over appointment process"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the court a quo erred in ordering punitive costs","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Appellants acted in good faith as de facto trustees"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellants were appointed as Trustees of the Centennial Trust in 2017. The first and second respondents, who were founding trustees, challenged these appointments claiming they were made without proper notice of meetings and without special resolutions as required by the Trust Deed. The High Court declared the appointments null and void.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases