Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Muhammed Akram v Olga Bhatti

HH 689-17

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
11 October 2017
Citation
HH 689-17
Neutral Citation
[2017] ZWHH 689
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
Muremba J
Full Bench
Muremba J
Areas of Law
Civil ProcedureCriminal ProcedureEnforcement of Orders
Keywords
restitutioncompensationregistrationex-partesection 372Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act
Tags
restitution ordercriminal compensationcivil registrationex-parte application
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act
  • Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act
  • Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether it was proper for the application to be made ex-parte","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Application brought without notice to respondent"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the restitution/compensation order is registerable as a civil order under section 372","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Order granted as suspended sentence condition under section 358"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant sought to register as a civil judgment a restitution order of US$169,720 granted against the respondent by the Magistrates Court in a criminal matter. The order was made as a condition of suspension of part of the respondent's sentence for extortion.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →