{"issue_text":"Whether the applicant complied with the divorce order requirements for sale of the matrimonial property","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Appointment of valuer, service of valuation report, appointment of estate agent"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the respondent's opposition to the sale was justified","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Respondent's non-cooperation, failure to buy out within 18 months"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The parties were divorced on 7 March 2013 with a 50/50 share in a matrimonial property. The respondent remained in occupation since 2013 while the applicant sought enforcement of the sale terms. The applicant had complied with court procedures for appointing a valuer and estate agent, but the respondent resisted cooperation throughout the process.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases