Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Supreme Court

Morgan Havire v Arosume Property Development (Private) Limited

SC 90/22

Case Details

Court
Supreme Court
Date
29 July 2022
Citation
SC 90/22
Neutral Citation
[2022] ZWSC 90
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Appeal

Bench

Presiding
MWAYERA JA
Full Bench
UCHENA JACHATUKUTA JAMWAYERA JA
Areas of Law
Property LawInterdict Law
Keywords
Interim InterdictPrima Facie RightBoundary WallBeacon Movement
Tags
InterdictProperty DevelopmentBoundary Dispute
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • N
  • o
  • s
  • t
  • a
  • t
  • u
  • t
  • e
  • s
  • w
  • e
  • r
  • e
  • e
  • x
  • p
  • r
  • e
  • s
  • s
  • l
  • y
  • c
  • i
  • t
  • e
  • d
  • o
  • r
  • i
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • r
  • p
  • r
  • e
  • t
  • e
  • d
  • i
  • n
  • t
  • h
  • i
  • s
  • j
  • u
  • d
  • g
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • .
  • T
  • h
  • e
  • c
  • o
  • u
  • r
  • t
  • r
  • e
  • l
  • i
  • e
  • d
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • i
  • r
  • e
  • l
  • y
  • o
  • n
  • c
  • o
  • m
  • m
  • o
  • n
  • l
  • a
  • w
  • p
  • r
  • i
  • n
  • c
  • i
  • p
  • l
  • e
  • s
  • r
  • e
  • g
  • a
  • r
  • d
  • i
  • n
  • g
  • i
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • r
  • d
  • i
  • c
  • t
  • s
  • .
  • #
  • #
  • #
  • O
  • T
  • H
  • E
  • R
  • A
  • U
  • T
  • H
  • O
  • R
  • I
  • T
  • I
  • E
  • S
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the court a quo erred in dismissing the urgent chamber application for interim interdict","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Respondent moved beacons; appellant sought to prevent further interference"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The appellant, a member of Sally Mugabe Housing Cooperative, was allocated stand number 254 at Carrick Creagh Township measuring 4,000 square metres. After developing the property including building a double storey house, the respondent (property developer) moved boundary beacons alleging encroachment onto another stand. The appellant sought an interim interdict to prevent further interference.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →