Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Moreblessing Chitiyo and Kumbirai Isaac Siduna v Jockstar Investments Limited

HH 589-17

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
6 September 2017
Citation
HH 589-17
Neutral Citation
[2017] ZWHH 589
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
Tagu J
Full Bench
Tagu J
Areas of Law
Property LawContract LawCivil Procedure
Keywords
Agreement of SaleStand AllocationBreach of ContractSummary Judgment
Tags
Property LawContract LawSummary Judgment
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • N
  • o
  • n
  • e
  • n
  • o
  • s
  • t
  • a
  • t
  • u
  • t
  • e
  • o
  • r
  • s
  • t
  • a
  • t
  • u
  • t
  • o
  • r
  • y
  • p
  • r
  • o
  • v
  • i
  • s
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • i
  • s
  • q
  • u
  • o
  • t
  • e
  • d
  • ,
  • i
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • r
  • p
  • r
  • e
  • t
  • e
  • d
  • o
  • r
  • a
  • p
  • p
  • l
  • i
  • e
  • d
  • .
  • T
  • h
  • e
  • c
  • o
  • u
  • r
  • t
  • r
  • e
  • l
  • i
  • e
  • s
  • e
  • x
  • c
  • l
  • u
  • s
  • i
  • v
  • e
  • l
  • y
  • o
  • n
  • t
  • h
  • e
  • c
  • o
  • n
  • t
  • r
  • a
  • c
  • t
  • u
  • a
  • l
  • c
  • l
  • a
  • u
  • s
  • e
  • a
  • n
  • d
  • t
  • h
  • e
  • c
  • o
  • m
  • m
  • o
  • n
  • -
  • l
  • a
  • w
  • r
  • u
  • l
  • e
  • s
  • g
  • o
  • v
  • e
  • r
  • n
  • i
  • n
  • g
  • s
  • u
  • m
  • m
  • a
  • r
  • y
  • j
  • u
  • d
  • g
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • .
  • #
  • #
  • #
  • O
  • T
  • H
  • E
  • R
  • A
  • U
  • T
  • H
  • O
  • R
  • I
  • T
  • I
  • E
  • S
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the preliminary point of lis pendens should succeed","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Existence of related cases HC 8237/2016 and HC 9546/2016"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the applicants are entitled to summary judgment","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Breach of contract by wrong stand allocation; failure to explain stand change"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether clause 6.5 justifies the stand change without explanation or refund","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Contract clause allowing stand changes; duty to explain and adjust price"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicants entered into an agreement of sale with the respondent for Stand 2537 measuring 2000 square metres for US$32,500 plus US$500 developmental fees. After full payment, the respondent allocated them Stand 3070 measuring only 1400 square metres instead of the agreed stand. Despite demands, the respondent refused to rectify the mistake or develop the area.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →