retirement agepension fund regulationscollective bargaining agreementstatutory instrument
legislation
Statutes Cited
Pensions and Provident Funds Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the appellant's retirement age from employment was 60 or 65 years","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"SI 147/81 provided 65 years; SI 135/2012 provided 60 years but excluded grades 1-4; appellant in grade 2"}
{"issue_text":"Whether pension fund regulations can fix retirement age from employment without agreement","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Pension fund regulations provided retirement ages 55-65; no evidence of agreement to import this into employment contract"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant was employed by City of Harare since 1981 with retirement age of 65 under SI 147/81. SI 135/2012 later reduced retirement age to 60 but excluded grades 1-4 while appellant was in grade 2. Respondent retired appellant at 60 relying on pension fund regulations. Appellant challenged this as unlawful.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases