Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether an application to compel compliance with a consent order is competent at law","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Consent order partially complied with, two properties unsold"}
{"issue_text":"Whether there was material non-disclosure of facts","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Respondent alleged non-disclosure"}
{"issue_text":"Whether there were material disputes of fact requiring oral evidence","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Respondent claimed disputes of fact existed"}
{"issue_text":"Whether respondent should be compelled to facilitate sale of remaining properties","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Two properties unsold, respondent not cooperating"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant sought an order compelling the respondent to comply with a divorce consent order issued on 1 April 2014 which required the sale and equal division of proceeds of two immovable properties. The respondent had partially complied by sharing one property but failed to facilitate the sale of the remaining two properties.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases