{"issue_text":"Whether the Arbitrator had jurisdiction to issue award beyond 60 days prescribed by court order","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Court order remitting matter within 60 days"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the Arbitrator failed to conduct hearing as required by 'hearing de novo'","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Court order requiring hearing de novo"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the Arbitrator failed to determine issue of reinstatement that had been preliminarily raised","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Preliminary point on reinstatement raised at conciliation"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the Arbitrator erred in issuing retrospective order of dismissal","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Dismissal ordered effective from date of Court order remitting matter"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Applicant Mike Manhuwa was employed as a driver by First Respondent Antar International Co. (Pvt) Ltd. Following an accident while driving, he was brought before a Disciplinary Committee which found him guilty. The matter came to this Court on review, where the Court set aside the Disciplinary Committee's decision and remitted the matter for hearing de novo before a Designated Agent of the Third Respondent within 60 days. The subsequent arbitration proceedings form the basis of this review and appeal.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases