Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Michael Maposa v CFX Bank (Private) Limited

HH 66-2011

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
11 January 2011
Citation
HH 66-2011
Neutral Citation
[2011] ZWHH 66
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Trial

Bench

Presiding
Patel J
Full Bench
Patel J
Areas of Law
Contract LawBanking Law
Keywords
Double saleContractual damagesRefundBreach of contract
Tags
Contract LawDouble SaleDamagesBanking
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • None identified
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the agreement between the parties is legally enforceable and has been breached by the defendant","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Double sale of property, cancellation of agreement"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the defendant is liable to the plaintiff in contractual damages","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Breach of contract, tender of refund, impossibility of specific performance"}
  • {"issue_text":"What is the quantum of damages payable to the plaintiff","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Amount of refund tendered, property valuations, currency devaluation"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The defendant bank sold the same property twice - first to POSB in June 2006, then to the plaintiff in July 2006. Upon discovering the error, the defendant cancelled the plaintiff's sale and offered a refund with interest, which the plaintiff rejected. The plaintiff sought specific performance which was dismissed, then claimed US$50,000 in damages.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →