{"issue_text":"Whether arbitrator erred in refusing to order reinstatement when appellant specifically prayed for it","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Appellant prayed for reinstatement; arbitrator acknowledged but awarded damages instead"}
{"issue_text":"Whether arbitrator erred in mixing concepts of back-pay and damages and using wrong cut-off date","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Arbitrator limited back-pay to date when appellant could have found alternative employment"}
{"issue_text":"Whether arbitrator erred in using NEC gazetted salary without evidence instead of parties' figures","issue_type":"fact/law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"No evidence led on actual salary; arbitrator chose lowest figure without reasons"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Appellant, employed as a waiter for 8 days, was dismissed and pursued arbitration. After an initial award was set aside, a second arbitration found in his favour but denied reinstatement and miscalculated damages, prompting this appeal.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases