rescission of judgmentconsent orderland allocationurban councils
legislation
Statutes Cited
High Court Rules 1971
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether applicants have locus standi to rescind a consent order to which they were not parties","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Applicants were not parties to HC 6908/13 but claim interest in the stands"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the consent order was erroneously granted in the absence of parties affected thereby","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicants claim they were the rightful allottees; first respondent admits they were prejudiced"}
{"issue_text":"Whether applicants have proved their case on balance of probabilities","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicants' occupation and development of stands; first respondent's admission"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicants sought rescission of a consent order granted on 11 September 2018 in HC 6908/13 between the City of Harare and its employees, which allocated stands to the respondents. The applicants, who claim to be the rightful allottees of the same stands, were not parties to that case and argue the order was erroneously granted in their absence.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases