{"issue_text":"Whether respondent was bound by Works Council decision to reduce salaries to 50%","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Transfer to Redwing Mine, Works Council agreement, respondent's absence from decision"}
{"issue_text":"Whether school fees allowance was subject to taxation","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Contractual benefit, school fees policy"}
{"issue_text":"Whether respondent proved payment of school fees claimed","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Invoices from Heritage School, bank statements, college fees"}
{"issue_text":"Whether travel allowance required approval by Group Chairman and CEO","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Policy wording \"subject to approval\""}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The respondent, employed as Business Planning Manager, claimed unpaid salary arrears and allowances. After conciliation failed, arbitration awarded him USD 355,351.11. The appellant appealed, challenging the salary arrears, school fees allowance and travel allowance components.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases