{"issue_text":"Whether the court a quo was correct in finding that claims 1-4 had prescribed","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Summons issued 4+ years after causes of action arose"}
{"issue_text":"Whether filing of counter-claim in arbitration interrupted prescription","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Counter-claim filed during arbitration proceedings"}
{"issue_text":"Whether lis alibi pendens defence was properly upheld for claim 5","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Labour complaint pending on same subject matter"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Appellants sued respondent for various sums allegedly owed arising from unlawful acts during employment. Respondent raised prescription and lis alibi pendens defences. High Court upheld both defences. Appellants appealed to Supreme Court.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases