MCR Vengesayi and Agnes Vengesayi carrying on business in partnership under the name Style Vengesayi Architects v Belvedere Nursing Home (Private) Limited
{"issue_text":"Whether the appellants proved entitlement to US$357,330.68 being 25% of their claim that had not prescribed","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Appellants submitted fee note on 3 August 2010; Contract provided for fee calculation method; Court a quo found valid contract and work done but dismissed for lack of quantum proof"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Appellants, a firm of architects, entered into a written agreement with respondent nursing home in 2005 to provide architectural services for hospital improvements. After rendering services and submitting fee notes, respondent refused to pay, denying the contract's validity. High Court found 75% of claim prescribed but dismissed even the 25% that had not prescribed, claiming insufficient proof of quantum.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases