{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator had jurisdiction to preside over NEC employees","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Respondent was employed as security guard; matter proceeded before labour officer"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The respondent was employed by the appellant as a security guard under a fixed-term contract. He claimed underpayment of salary and the arbitrator awarded acting allowance. The appellant appealed on the basis that the arbitrator lacked jurisdiction over NEC employees.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases