Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Maxlucky Tobacco (Private) Limited v Doesmatter Muvimbi

HH 674-17

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
11 October 2017
Citation
HH 674-17
Neutral Citation
[2017] ZWHH 674
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Trial

Bench

Presiding
TAGU J
Full Bench
TAGU J
Areas of Law
Contract LawCommercial LawAgricultural Finance
Keywords
Tobacco Contract Growing SchemeBreach of ContractLoan RepaymentCounter-claimAcknowledgement of Debt
Tags
Contract LawTobacco Contract GrowingBreach of ContractCounter-claim
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • N
  • o
  • n
  • e
  • n
  • o
  • s
  • t
  • a
  • t
  • u
  • t
  • e
  • o
  • r
  • s
  • t
  • a
  • t
  • u
  • t
  • o
  • r
  • y
  • i
  • n
  • s
  • t
  • r
  • u
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • i
  • s
  • r
  • e
  • f
  • e
  • r
  • r
  • e
  • d
  • t
  • o
  • a
  • n
  • y
  • w
  • h
  • e
  • r
  • e
  • i
  • n
  • t
  • h
  • e
  • j
  • u
  • d
  • g
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • .
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the amount of USD 36,941.20 or any amount at all","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Defendant acknowledged indebtedness, failed to deliver tobacco, failed to repay loan"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the plaintiff is liable to the defendant for the amount of USD 62,500.00","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Defendant's allegation of breach, counter-claim for lost revenue"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The plaintiff and defendant entered into a Tobacco Contract Growing and Marketing Scheme in October 2014, where the plaintiff provided financial and input support totaling US$37,302.49 for tobacco production on 10 hectares. The defendant failed to deliver the agreed quantities of tobacco and repay the loan, leading to the plaintiff's claim. The defendant counter-claimed for lost revenue, alleging the plaintiff breached by failing to finance the project and unilaterally changing contract terms.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →