{"issue_text":"Whether to grant divorce given one spouse's reluctance","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Both parties agreed marriage broken down but defendant wanted reconciliation"}
{"issue_text":"What percentage share should plaintiff receive of matrimonial home","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"30+ year marriage; plaintiff's indirect contributions; defendant's larger direct contributions"}
{"issue_text":"Who should have custody of mentally handicapped adult son Nyasha","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Nyasha is 32-year-old perpetual minor; plaintiff provides financial support; defendant provides daily care"}
{"issue_text":"What maintenance should plaintiff pay for Nyasha's upkeep","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Plaintiff earns US$1100/month; defendant earns US$97/month; Nyasha requires ongoing care"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The parties were customarily married in 1981 and registered the union in 1983. After 30+ years of marriage and three children, they sought divorce with disputes over the matrimonial home (No 7 Kingfisher Borrowdale) and custody of their mentally handicapped adult son Nyasha who requires perpetual care.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases