Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Maria Sixpence v James Chinodakufa

HH 196-2011

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
28 September 2011
Citation
HH 196-2011
Neutral Citation
[2011] ZWHH 196
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
Bhunu J
Full Bench
Bhunu J
Areas of Law
Property LawCivil Procedure
Keywords
Consent orderProperty evaluationStand improvementsExecution
Tags
Property valuationConsent order enforcement
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • N
  • o
  • n
  • e
  • n
  • o
  • s
  • t
  • a
  • t
  • u
  • t
  • e
  • ,
  • s
  • t
  • a
  • t
  • u
  • t
  • o
  • r
  • y
  • i
  • n
  • s
  • t
  • r
  • u
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • o
  • r
  • c
  • o
  • n
  • s
  • t
  • i
  • t
  • u
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • p
  • r
  • o
  • v
  • i
  • s
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • i
  • s
  • c
  • i
  • t
  • e
  • d
  • o
  • r
  • i
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • r
  • p
  • r
  • e
  • t
  • e
  • d
  • .
  • #
  • #
  • #
  • O
  • T
  • H
  • E
  • R
  • A
  • U
  • T
  • H
  • O
  • R
  • I
  • T
  • I
  • E
  • S
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether respondent should be given further indulgence beyond 3 months to pay","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Respondent has had over 2 years since 2009 order"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The parties had a 2009 consent order requiring the respondent to pay 50% of assessed value of improvements on a property. After evaluation, respondent failed to pay and offered installment payments over 12 months, which applicant rejected. Applicant later accepted 3-month payment period with sale of property if unpaid.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →