{"issue_text":"Whether the court can order joint registration of property when consent paper only apportioned shares without addressing title","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Consent paper awarded shares but not transfer; property remained in sole name"}
{"issue_text":"Whether applicant's 60% share constitutes a real right enforceable against third parties","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Property registered in sole name; applicant claiming joint ownership"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant and respondent divorced in 2017 with a consent paper awarding applicant 60% share in immovable property at 92 George Road, Chegutu, but property remained registered solely in respondent's name. Applicant sought joint registration to reflect the consent paper arrangement, while respondent sold the property without her consent.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases