{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred in law by finding unfair dismissal under Section 12B(3)(b) when respondents failed to prove legitimate expectation","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Continuous renewal of contracts, termination, claim of replacement"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the requirements of Section 12B(3)(b) are conjunctive","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Arbitrator's findings on legitimate expectation and replacement"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant employed 12 respondents on fixed-term contracts that were continuously renewed. The contracts were eventually terminated and the respondents claimed unfair dismissal. An arbitrator found in favour of the respondents and ordered payment of various benefits. The appellant appealed, arguing the arbitrator misdirected himself on the law regarding legitimate expectation of renewal.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases