Disciplinary proceedingsReview applicationCode of Conduct
legislation
Statutes Cited
Statutory Instrument 379/90 (Code of Conduct)
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the disciplinary body was improperly composed under the Code of Conduct S I 379/90","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Code requires two-tier process but only one disciplinary body was used"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the applicant was denied opportunity to mitigate as required by the Code of Conduct","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes\n### ARGUMENTS SECTION","related_facts":"Code requires proper mitigation opportunity but only written submissions were allowed"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Applicant Malvern Mano was found guilty of misconduct by his employer and dismissed from work. He filed a review application challenging the disciplinary proceedings on five grounds, later withdrawing three grounds and proceeding with two: improper composition of the disciplinary body and failure to allow mitigation. The employer opposed the review, arguing the disciplinary body was properly constituted and mitigation opportunities were provided.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases