{"issue_text":"Whether the respondents' claims for underpayments from January 2012 to June 2013 had prescribed given that referral was made on 12 June 2014","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Statutory instruments gazetted 10 May 2013, referral made 12 June 2014"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred by applying Statutory Instrument 59 of 2013 which does not contain job classifications","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Statutory Instrument 59 refers to grades, Statutory Instrument 102 of 2014 contains classifications"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant, a non-governmental organization, employed 53 respondents as security guards on fixed-term contracts. After contracts were not renewed in December 2013, respondents claimed underpayments from January 2010 to December 2013 based on Statutory Instruments 58 and 59 of 2013. The matter was referred to arbitration where claims totaling $226,112.85 were partially upheld.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases