Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Constitutional Court

Loveness Mudzuru (2) Ruvimbo Tsopodzi v Minister of Justice, Legal & Parliamentary Affairs N.O. (2) Minister of Women’s Affairs, Gender & Community Development (3) Attorney General of Zimbabwe

[2016] ZWCCZ 12

Case Details

Court
Constitutional Court
Date
20 January 2016
Citation
[2016] ZWCCZ 12
Judgment No.
CCZ 12/2015
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
Malaba DCJ
Full Bench
Chidyausiku CJMalaba DCJZiyambi JCCGwaunza JCCGarwe JCCGowora JCCHlatshwayo JCCPatel JCCGuvava JCC
Areas of Law
Constitutional LawHuman Rights LawFamily Law
Keywords
child marriageminimum age of marriageconstitutional interpretationchildren's rightsgender discrimination
Tags
child marriageconstitutional rightsgender equalitychildren's rights
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • C
  • o
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • m
  • p
  • t
  • o
  • f
  • C
  • o
  • u
  • r
  • t
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 8
  • 1
  • ,
  • s
  • .
  • 8
  • J
  • u
  • r
  • i
  • e
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 7
  • 4
  • ,
  • s
  • s
  • .
  • 1
  • ,
  • 1
  • 6
  • ,
  • 1
  • 7
  • ,
  • 2
  • 0
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • J
  • u
  • s
  • t
  • i
  • c
  • e
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3
  • ,
  • s
  • s
  • .
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 5
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 8
  • ,
  • S
  • c
  • h
  • .
  • 1
  • ,
  • A
  • r
  • t
  • .
  • 6
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether applicants have locus standi under section 85(1) of the Constitution","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Applicants not victims of child marriage; acting in public interest"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether section 78(1) of Constitution sets 18 years as minimum marriage age","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Section gives right to found family to those aged 18+; marriage rights heading"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether section 22(1) of Marriage Act is unconstitutional","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Permits marriage of 16-year-old girls; violates constitutional rights"}
  • {"issue_text":"What appropriate relief should be granted","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Declaration of invalidity sought; need for effective protection"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

Two young women aged 19 and 18 years approached the Constitutional Court seeking a declaration that section 78(1) of the Constitution sets 18 years as the minimum age of marriage in Zimbabwe, and that section 22(1) of the Marriage Act permitting girls aged 16 to marry was unconstitutional.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →