Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

LOCAL AUTHORITIES PENSION FUND (PVT) LTD versus MOONLIGHT PROVIDENT ASSOCIATES (PVT) LTD

HH 136-2010

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
14 July 2010
Citation
HH 136-2010
Neutral Citation
[2010] ZWHH 136
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
HUNGWJE J
Full Bench
HUNGWJE J
Areas of Law
Commercial lawProperty law
Keywords
Lease agreementsRental arrearsSummary judgmentOperating costs
Tags
Lease agreementSummary judgmentArrears
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • High Court Rules, Order 10 Rule 1 (summary judgment where defendant has no bona-fide defence)
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the respondent has a bona fide defence to the applicant's claim for summary judgment","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Respondent's denial of rental agreement, claim of overpayment, surrender of premises"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether rentals were fixed at US$9,000 per month from February 2009","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Respondent's offer of US$9,000, applicant's acceptance, no payment made"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the respondent made overpayments in Zimbabwe dollars","issue_type":"factual","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Respondent's claim of overpayment, timing of claim, absence of prior complaint"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant leased premises to the respondent under three lease agreements for floors 4-7 of LAPF Centre. After the agreements expired, the respondent continued occupying the premises but failed to pay rent and operating costs from February 2009. The respondent offered to pay US$9,000 monthly rent which the applicant accepted, but no payments were made.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →