Lloyd Masarirambi v C M E D (PVT) LTD

Key Issues

• {"issue_text":"Whether the disciplinary committee erred in finding appellant guilty on balance of probabilities","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Appellant received $5 but allegedly paid less; conflicting evidence on parking fee amount"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether principle of natural justice was followed given other drivers were reinstated","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Other drivers with same offence were reinstated"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether committee erred by phoning during hearing","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Committee made phone inquiry during hearing"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether there was victimisation of workers committee members","issue_type":"factual","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Allegation of fabricated material against workers committee"}

Background