Rule 449Leave to applyDirect accessState landPrivate landSchedule 7 Constitution
Tags
Land ownershipConstitutional interpretationRescission of court orders
legislation
Statutes Cited
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Constitution of Zimbabwe (repealed)
Land Acquisition Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether leave of the court is required under r 21(1) for an application to rescind a Constitutional Court order under r 449 of the High Court Rules","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Application brought without leave; r 449 not listed in r 21(1) exceptions"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicants sought rescission of a 2015 Constitutional Court order that declared Kingsdale of Johannesburg to be private land, arguing it was State land listed in Schedule 7 of the repealed constitution. The court struck the matter off the roll for failure to obtain leave as required by r 21(1).
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases