Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Bulawayo High Court

LISTER MAGOCHE v CITY OF BULAWAYO COMMERCIAL ENTITIES t/a INGWEBU BREWERIES AND KUPPKRAFT (PRIVATE) LIMITED

HB 171/25

Case Details

Court
Bulawayo High Court
Date
17 October 2025
Citation
HB 171/25
Neutral Citation
[2025] ZWHB 171
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Urgent Application

Bench

Presiding
MOYO J
Full Bench
MOYO J
Areas of Law
Commercial LawContract LawInterdict Relief
Keywords
Preservation of fundsBrutum fulmenPrima facie rightBalance of convenience
Tags
InterdictPreservation of fundsContractual dispute
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • N
  • o
  • n
  • e
  • n
  • o
  • s
  • t
  • a
  • t
  • u
  • t
  • e
  • ,
  • s
  • t
  • a
  • t
  • u
  • t
  • o
  • r
  • y
  • i
  • n
  • s
  • t
  • r
  • u
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • o
  • r
  • c
  • o
  • n
  • s
  • t
  • i
  • t
  • u
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • p
  • r
  • o
  • v
  • i
  • s
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • i
  • s
  • q
  • u
  • o
  • t
  • e
  • d
  • ,
  • i
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • r
  • p
  • r
  • e
  • t
  • e
  • d
  • o
  • r
  • a
  • p
  • p
  • l
  • i
  • e
  • d
  • .
  • #
  • #
  • #
  • O
  • T
  • H
  • E
  • R
  • A
  • U
  • T
  • H
  • O
  • R
  • I
  • T
  • I
  • E
  • S
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether applicant has shown a prima facie right to warrant preservation of disputed funds","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant's title deeds used as collateral; verbal arrangement on contract participation"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether there is reasonable ground to fear dissipation of funds by 2nd respondent","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Allegations of financial instability; lack of attachable assets"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether balance of convenience favours granting the interdict","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Pending litigation in HCBC 567/25; potential for judgment to be brutum fulmen"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

Applicant and 2nd respondent had a verbal arrangement regarding participation in a contract with 1st respondent. Applicant fears that 2nd respondent will dissipate funds due to financial instability, rendering any future judgment in her favour in HCBC 567/25 a brutum fulmen. Applicant seeks to preserve the funds pending determination of the main dispute.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →