{"issue_text":"Whether arbitrator acted outside his terms of reference by deciding issues not before him","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Arbitrator nullified disciplinary proceedings conducted after referral"}
{"issue_text":"Whether arbitrator misinterpreted Section 101(6) on what amounts to a referral","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Matter referred to Labour Officer before disciplinary hearing"}
{"issue_text":"Whether arbitrator erred in finding disciplinary hearing started 5th October 2012","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Different dates for commencement of disciplinary process"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The respondent employee was suspended for alleged breach of code of conduct and referred the matter to a Labour Officer under section 101(6). The appellant employer then conducted disciplinary proceedings after the referral and dismissed the respondent. The arbitrator nullified these proceedings and ordered reinstatement. The appellant appealed against this arbitral award.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases