{"issue_text":"Whether a tacit universal partnership existed between the parties","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Plaintiff's contribution of US$500, assistance in business, joint property ownership"}
{"issue_text":"Whether plaintiff is entitled to half of the property sale proceeds","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Property registered in both names, plaintiff received nothing"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The plaintiff claimed half of the proceeds from the sale of jointly owned property and half of alleged business stock, asserting a tacit universal partnership with the defendant. They had cohabited since 2014, had three children together, and purchased property in both names which was later sold for US$65,000.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases