Lakefin Marketing (Pvt) Ltd v Florence Matsveru

Key Issues

• {"issue_text":"Did the arbitrator err by determining unfair dismissal on the previous award instead of fresh submissions?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Matter remitted by consent for fresh determination"}
• {"issue_text":"Was the arbitrator correct in awarding 90 days cash in lieu of annual leave?","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"No evidence of shutdown policy or contractual incorporation; section 14A(2) Labour Act"}
• {"issue_text":"Should respondent have been paid $299.87 during maternity leave?","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Gazette rate for grade B1 was $299.87; she received $250"}
• {"issue_text":"Did the arbitrator address all issues remitted by the Labour Court?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"List of five issues remitted"}

Background