Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Konono Konono v Brian Mapurisa

HH 433-21

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
26 August 2021
Citation
HH 433-21
Neutral Citation
[2021] ZWHH 433
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Trial

Bench

Presiding
Muzofa J
Full Bench
Muzofa J
Areas of Law
Property LawContract LawCivil Procedure
Keywords
property salepurchase price refundprescriptionagreement of saletransfer of property
Tags
property salebreach of contractprescription
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Prescription Act
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether plaintiff's claim has prescribed","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Cause of action arose when plaintiff learned of sale to Cosmas"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether defendant received payment from plaintiff for the stand","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Plaintiff's testimony of payment, defendant's admission in previous proceedings"}
  • {"issue_text":"Amount paid by plaintiff and currency thereof","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Agreement specified US dollars, legal tender in 2012"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether defendant is obliged to refund money received","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Defendant failed to transfer property and sold to third party"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The plaintiff purchased a stand from the defendant in December 2012 for US$27,000 and paid the full purchase price. The defendant failed to transfer the property and instead sold it to a third party. After an unsuccessful application to be declared owner, the plaintiff sued for refund of the purchase price.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →