struck off the rollPractice Direction 3/2013form 29form 29Breinstatement
Tags
discoverypre-trial procedurestruck off roll
legislation
Statutes Cited
High Court Rules, 1971
High Court Rules, 1971
High Court Rules, 1971
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Does use of Form 29B instead of Form 29 render the application fatally defective?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Application served on respondent using Form 29B; correct form should be Form 29 with modifications"}
{"issue_text":"Can application to compel discovery proceed when main case struck off roll and never reinstated?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Main case HC 13081/12 struck off 10 September 2014; no reinstatement application pending; Practice Direction 3/2013 in effect"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Applicant brought application to compel respondent to file pre-trial documents in case HC 13081/12. Respondent raised two points in limine: application used wrong form and main case had been struck off roll in 2014 with no reinstatement. Matter struck off for non-appearance of both parties on 10 September 2014. Applicant waited until 2019 to attempt revival, filed reinstatement application in July 2019 but withdrew it in October 2019.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases