Khaya Cement Limited (Formerly known as Lafarge Cement Zimbabwe Limited) v Hhoopwestern Investments (Private) Limited t/a Afrimining and Master of the High Court and The Registrar of Companies
Provisional liquidationInability to pay debtsInsolvency ActExecution of judgment
Tags
InsolvencyCompany LiquidationProvisional Order
legislation
Statutes Cited
Insolvency Act
Insolvency Act
Insolvency Act
Insolvency Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the first respondent is unable to pay its debts as envisaged in s 3 of the Insolvency Act","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Debt amount, execution results, absence of nulla bona return"}
{"issue_text":"Whether it is just and equitable to grant the provisional liquidation order","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Conduct of execution, impact on various stakeholders"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant sought provisional liquidation of the first respondent based on an arbitral award of US$510,979.80 plus interest. After registering the award as a court order, the applicant attached and sold some of the respondent's property that was in its custody, realizing only US$35,318.50. The applicant then alleged the respondent was unable to pay its debts and sought liquidation.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases