Compulsory land acquisitionAgricultural landPeri-urban landSection 72 ConstitutionLand Acquisition Act
Tags
Land acquisitionCompulsory acquisitionAgricultural landPeri-urban land
legislation
Statutes Cited
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment [No 20] Act 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment [No 20] Act 2013
Land Acquisition Act
Land Acquisition Act
High Court Act
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment [No 20] Act 2013
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether Wick falls within the definition of agricultural land under s 72 of the Constitution","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Nature and use of Wick property"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the applicant proved its case on a balance of probabilities","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Evidence presented in founding affidavit"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant sought a declaratur that a farm called Wick was not agricultural land and that its compulsory acquisition was invalid. The property was compulsorily acquired by the Minister of Lands and Rural Resettlement, first under s 293(1) of the Constitution (which was invalid) and later under s 72 of the Constitution. The applicant failed to prove that Wick was peri-urban rather than agricultural land.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases