Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Kaskay Properties (Pvt) Ltd v Minister of Lands and Rural Resettlement and 2 Others

HH 762-17

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
13 November 2017
Citation
HH 762-17
Neutral Citation
[2017] ZWHH 762
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
Mangota J
Full Bench
Mangota J
Areas of Law
Property lawConstitutional lawAdministrative law
Keywords
Compulsory land acquisitionAgricultural landPeri-urban landSection 72 ConstitutionLand Acquisition Act
Tags
Land acquisitionCompulsory acquisitionAgricultural landPeri-urban land
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment [No 20] Act 2013
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment [No 20] Act 2013
  • Land Acquisition Act
  • Land Acquisition Act
  • High Court Act
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment [No 20] Act 2013
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether Wick falls within the definition of agricultural land under s 72 of the Constitution","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Nature and use of Wick property"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the applicant proved its case on a balance of probabilities","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Evidence presented in founding affidavit"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant sought a declaratur that a farm called Wick was not agricultural land and that its compulsory acquisition was invalid. The property was compulsorily acquired by the Minister of Lands and Rural Resettlement, first under s 293(1) of the Constitution (which was invalid) and later under s 72 of the Constitution. The applicant failed to prove that Wick was peri-urban rather than agricultural land.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →