Rule 449 High Court RulesCorrection of judgmentCitation errorMinisterial capacity
Tags
Rule 449 correctionCitation errorMining dispute
legislation
Statutes Cited
State Liabilities Act
High Court Rules, 1971
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether Rule 449 can be invoked to correct a citation error where a non-existent party (Ministry) was cited instead of the proper legal entity (Minister)","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Citation of Ministry instead of Minister in original application"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant sought to correct a 2017 judgment that had cited "Ministry of Mines and Mining Development N.O." instead of "Minister of Mines and Mining Development N.O." The applicant claimed this was a common mistake correctable under Rule 449, while the first respondent opposed, arguing it was an attempt to substitute a non-existent party with a new one.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases