Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Justin Taonehama Samudzimu v Sithandiwe Miranda Ngwenya

HH 92-2008

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
16 October 2008
Citation
HH 92-2008
Neutral Citation
[2008] ZWHH 92
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
Kudya J
Full Bench
Kudya J
Areas of Law
Family lawChild custodyAccess rights
Keywords
interim custodyrelocation to South Africadenial of accessbest interests of children
Tags
child custodyaccess rightsrelocationconsent order
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • N
  • o
  • s
  • t
  • a
  • t
  • u
  • t
  • e
  • s
  • w
  • e
  • r
  • e
  • c
  • i
  • t
  • e
  • d
  • i
  • n
  • t
  • h
  • i
  • s
  • j
  • u
  • d
  • g
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • .
  • T
  • h
  • e
  • c
  • o
  • u
  • r
  • t
  • r
  • e
  • l
  • i
  • e
  • d
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • i
  • r
  • e
  • l
  • y
  • o
  • n
  • c
  • o
  • m
  • m
  • o
  • n
  • l
  • a
  • w
  • p
  • r
  • i
  • n
  • c
  • i
  • p
  • l
  • e
  • s
  • a
  • n
  • d
  • p
  • r
  • e
  • v
  • i
  • o
  • u
  • s
  • c
  • a
  • s
  • e
  • l
  • a
  • w
  • .
  • #
  • #
  • #
  • O
  • T
  • H
  • E
  • R
  • A
  • U
  • T
  • H
  • O
  • R
  • I
  • T
  • I
  • E
  • S
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether respondent breached consent order by relocating to Bulawayo","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Relocation to Bulawayo; alleged access denial"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether applicant established grounds for interim custody","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Alleged access denial; respondent's relocation to South Africa"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether respondent should be authorised to remove children to South Africa","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Respondent's employment; applicant's refusal of consent"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant sought interim custody of two minor children alleging the respondent had denied him access since relocating to Bulawayo and then South Africa. The respondent counter-applied for authority to remove the children to South Africa, having secured employment there.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →