{"issue_text":"Whether the appellants were fugitives from justice and should not be heard","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Appellants were removed from remand, not on police wanted list"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the grounds of appeal raised procedural issues requiring review rather than appeal","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Grounds challenged arbitrator's findings on disciplinary hearing procedure"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the grounds of appeal raised questions of law","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Challenge was to factual findings of arbitrator"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the appellants waived their right to appeal by enforcing part of the award","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Appellants enforced salary portion while appealing dismissal portion"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Eight employees appealed against an arbitral award that upheld their dismissal. The respondent raised four preliminary points challenging the appeal, including that the appellants were fugitives from justice, that the appeal raised procedural issues requiring review rather than appeal, that no questions of law were raised, and that the appellants had waived their right to appeal by enforcing part of the arbitral award.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases