{"issue_text":"What constitutes equitable distribution of matrimonial assets under section 7 of Matrimonial Causes Act?","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Three immovable properties acquired, registered in joint names, disputed contributions"}
{"issue_text":"What maintenance should be awarded for minor child?","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"One minor child remaining, parties' financial capacities"}
{"issue_text":"Who should have custody of minor child?","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"One minor child aged 12, parties' caregiving roles"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The parties married in 2003 under the Marriage Act and have three children. Both agree their marriage has irretrievably broken down but dispute the cause. They have agreed on division of most movable property and one immovable property (Rujeko house to defendant) but contest division of Chesvingo shop and Zimre Park property, plus maintenance for the minor child.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases