Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Bulawayo High Court

Joseph Nyararai & 16 Others v Sino-Zimbabwe Company (Pvt) Ltd & National Employment Council for the Cement and Lime Industry

HB 06-20

Case Details

Court
Bulawayo High Court
Date
23 January 2020
Citation
HB 06-20
Neutral Citation
[2020] ZWHB 06
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
Takuva J
Full Bench
Takuva J
Areas of Law
Labour LawContract Law
Keywords
Collective Bargaining AgreementPublicationCommon LawPersonal to HolderJob Evaluation
Tags
Collective Bargaining AgreementPublication RequirementsCommon Law Contract
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • E
  • u
  • r
  • o
  • p
  • e
  • a
  • n
  • C
  • o
  • n
  • v
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • o
  • n
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • (
  • E
  • C
  • H
  • R
  • )
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 8
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • J
  • u
  • s
  • t
  • i
  • c
  • e
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • e
  • (
  • S
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • n
  • c
  • e
  • s
  • )
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 7
  • P
  • r
  • i
  • s
  • o
  • n
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 5
  • 2
  • C
  • o
  • n
  • s
  • t
  • i
  • t
  • u
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • R
  • e
  • f
  • o
  • r
  • m
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 5
  • S
  • e
  • n
  • i
  • o
  • r
  • C
  • o
  • u
  • r
  • t
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 8
  • 1
  • S
  • u
  • p
  • r
  • e
  • m
  • e
  • C
  • o
  • u
  • r
  • t
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 8
  • 1
  • M
  • a
  • g
  • n
  • a
  • C
  • a
  • r
  • t
  • a
  • 1
  • 2
  • 9
  • 7
  • B
  • i
  • l
  • l
  • o
  • f
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • 1
  • 6
  • 8
  • 9
  • P
  • a
  • r
  • l
  • i
  • a
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • a
  • r
  • y
  • P
  • a
  • p
  • e
  • r
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 8
  • 4
  • 0
  • H
  • o
  • u
  • s
  • e
  • o
  • f
  • C
  • o
  • m
  • m
  • o
  • n
  • s
  • D
  • i
  • s
  • q
  • u
  • a
  • l
  • i
  • f
  • i
  • c
  • a
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 7
  • 5
  • M
  • i
  • n
  • i
  • s
  • t
  • e
  • r
  • i
  • a
  • l
  • a
  • n
  • d
  • O
  • t
  • h
  • e
  • r
  • S
  • a
  • l
  • a
  • r
  • i
  • e
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 7
  • 5
  • E
  • u
  • r
  • o
  • p
  • e
  • a
  • n
  • C
  • o
  • m
  • m
  • u
  • n
  • i
  • t
  • i
  • e
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 7
  • 2
  • E
  • u
  • r
  • o
  • p
  • e
  • a
  • n
  • U
  • n
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • (
  • W
  • i
  • t
  • h
  • d
  • r
  • a
  • w
  • a
  • l
  • )
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 1
  • 8
  • I
  • m
  • m
  • i
  • g
  • r
  • a
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 7
  • 1
  • N
  • a
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • i
  • t
  • y
  • ,
  • I
  • m
  • m
  • i
  • g
  • r
  • a
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • a
  • n
  • d
  • A
  • s
  • y
  • l
  • u
  • m
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2
  • T
  • r
  • i
  • b
  • u
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • s
  • ,
  • C
  • o
  • u
  • r
  • t
  • s
  • a
  • n
  • d
  • E
  • n
  • f
  • o
  • r
  • c
  • e
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 7
  • L
  • e
  • g
  • a
  • l
  • A
  • i
  • d
  • ,
  • S
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • n
  • c
  • i
  • n
  • g
  • a
  • n
  • d
  • P
  • u
  • n
  • i
  • s
  • h
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • o
  • f
  • O
  • f
  • f
  • e
  • n
  • d
  • e
  • r
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • D
  • a
  • t
  • a
  • P
  • r
  • o
  • t
  • e
  • c
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 1
  • 8
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Does this Court have jurisdiction to entertain a declaratory application regarding enforcement of an unregistered CBA?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"CBA registered but not published; applicants bypassed Labour Act procedures"}
  • {"issue_text":"Is an unpublished CBA binding as a common law agreement?","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"CBA negotiated and applied since 2004 but never published"}
  • {"issue_text":"Were applicants' contracts unlawfully varied removing personal to holder protection?","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Employer removed protection claiming CBA not binding"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

16 employees sought a declaratory order that their employer's variation of their contracts to remove "personal to holder" salary protection after job evaluation was unlawful. The Collective Bargaining Agreement governing this protection was registered but never published as required by law.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →