Jonathan Nathaniel Moyo v (1) Sergeant Chacha (2) The Zimbabwe Anti-Corruption Commission (3) The Commissioner General of Police, Zimbabwe Republic Police (4) The Prosecutor-General
constitutional jurisdictionright to personal libertyunlawful arrestsubsidiarity principle
legislation
Statutes Cited
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act
Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act
Anti-Corruption Commission Act
Anti-Corruption Commission Act
Police Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Does the Constitutional Court have jurisdiction to determine the lawfulness of an arrest?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant challenged lawfulness of his arrest"}
{"issue_text":"Did the arrest comply with requirements of lawful arrest under CP&E Act?","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Applicant alleged arrest was unlawful"}
{"issue_text":"Does ZACC have powers of arrest?","issue_type":"legal","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Applicant arrested by officer seconded to ZACC"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant, a government minister, was arrested by a police officer seconded to ZACC after an interview at ZACC offices. He challenged the lawfulness of his arrest in the Constitutional Court, alleging violations of his constitutional rights to personal liberty and claiming ZACC had no arrest powers.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases