John Farley Pietersen and Mark Johnstone v Duration Gold Zimbabwe (Pvt) Ltd and All Flame Marketing (Pvt) Ltd and Competitive Marketing (Pvt) Ltd and DGL Investments Number Twenty One (Mauritius)
{"issue_text":"Whether the court should declare applicants as majority shareholders owning 57.45% of second respondent's shares","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Share sale agreements, non-payment of purchase price, joint venture agreement"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the share certificate showing fourth respondent as 100% shareholder should be declared null and void","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Share transfer to fourth respondent as nominee"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicants sought declarations that they are majority shareholders of the second respondent (owning 57.45% of shares) and that a share certificate showing the fourth respondent as 100% shareholder be declared null and void. The dispute arose from a series of agreements including share sale agreements and a joint venture agreement where shares were transferred but purchase prices remained unpaid.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases