{"issue_text":"Whether the appellant had a legitimate expectation of contract renewal under section 12B(3)(b) of the Labour Act","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Two years of continuous monthly contract renewals; last contract unusually short (5 days)"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the appellant was replaced by Mr Chari in violation of section 12B(3)(b)","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Mr Chari employed immediately after appellant's contract expired; both employed as riggers"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant was employed on monthly fixed-term contracts as a rigger for two years until 5 September 2010. His contract was not renewed and Herbert Chari was employed from 6-30 September 2010. The appellant claimed unfair dismissal alleging violation of section 12B(3)(b) of the Labour Act.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases