prescriptioncause of actionmorademand for transferspecial plea
Tags
prescriptionspecific performancecontract of saleimmovable property
legislation
Statutes Cited
Prescription Act
Prescription Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the High Court erred in dismissing the special pleas of prescription without evidence","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"No evidence of demand for transfer, no replication filed"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the cause of action arose in 2002 or upon demand for transfer","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Agreement silent on transfer date, no demand made"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Two sisters (appellants) sold immovable properties to the respondent in 2002. In 2014, the respondent sued for transfer of the properties. The appellants raised special pleas of prescription, arguing the claims had prescribed after 3 years. The High Court dismissed the pleas, finding no evidence of when demand for transfer was made. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that the High Court erred by deciding the matter without evidence.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases