Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Jameson Rushwaya and Annie Rushwaya and Xelod Investments (Pvt) Ltd v Swimming Pool & Underwater Repair (Pvt) Ltd and Aepromm Resources (Pvt) Ltd and Tolrose Investments (Pvt) Ltd and Patterson Fungayi Timba and The Provincial Mining Director N.O. and The Registrar of Companies N.O.

HH 378-25

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
27 June 2025
Citation
HH 378-25
Neutral Citation
[2025] ZWHH 378
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
Chitapi J
Full Bench
Chitapi J
Areas of Law
Civil procedureCompany law
Keywords
condonationrescission of judgmentconsent orderrule 449shareholding dispute
Tags
company lawshareholding disputesconsent judgment
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • High Court Rules, 1971
  • High Court Rules, 2021
  • High Court Rules, 1971
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether condonation is required for late filing of application to rescind consent judgment under rule 449","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Application filed 30 months after judgment"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the applicants have provided acceptable explanation for the delay","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"First applicant in hiding, threats to life, legal practitioner acted without instructions"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the applicants have prospects of success in the proposed rescission application","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"No signatures on consent order, legal practitioner may have acted without instructions"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicants sought condonation for late filing of an application to rescind a consent judgment granted in 2017 concerning shareholding in mining companies. The first applicant claimed he was unaware of the trial date due to being in hiding following threats to his life and that his legal practitioner had acted without instructions in consenting to judgment.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →